Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Answers to you/your site

We oppose it. Because Religion is detached from the modern democratic State.

At the same time in India we hasn’t got any bad feeling for it.

Because it is the symbol of oldest Victorian sector of people (known as Gulam).

Periar is not like a becker or a patient or a bad-fellow.

But he became a social reformer to the suppressed people. Ex. Vaikkam struggle, First ammenment on the Indian Constitution (Communual GO), infinity. We got the study from his contribution.

But the bad-fellows are there on the Sri Ranganathan Temple. It is proved by Ma.Ka.EE.Kha’s 1993 “Karuvarai Nuzhaivu Phorattam”.

A stone had developed to a god for the Barbarians (Aryyaas) property. But Periyar is the symbol to the continuous fighting against Social Suppressions (above to 96 year of age).

If you take the history from your Phurana stories, we take the original history of Srirangam how stolen from Bhuthism.

Answer to YOU also

If you not accept the two controvercial things at a same place, you have not fit to leave the scientific world (ex, electron vs. proton at a atom, Male vs. Female in Biological ENVIRONMENT, etc)

Please ask this question while read the sentence “Smoking is injurious to Health” on the Cigarrete backet.

We are not ask to ranganathan at the position of attention as Military peoples.

We accept that the majority peoples are athist. But all the athist are not Hindu. All hidus are not included to the upper community by you and Manushmiruthi. So this requirement, ie romove the periayar statue is Minority’s requirement.

We are not ask to give the town of Erode for Periyar statue. While All struggle against Aryan Superiority, the oldman of Erode will come with us. The ground for this is allover the world derived from the way of approach and criticism.

But, the unquestionable Raman whom is a person of untrust against his wife also, evolved beyond his city only.

aasath